<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Brownian Motion on Inflection Quant Lab</title><link>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/tags/brownian-motion/</link><description>Recent content in Brownian Motion on Inflection Quant Lab</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/tags/brownian-motion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Brownian Motion: From Random Walks to Option Prices</title><link>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/understanding_brownian_motion/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/understanding_brownian_motion/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brownian motion, the mathematical model underlying everything from stock prices to heat diffusion, has one of its most elegant properties: the variance of its position at time $t$ grows linearly with time. Not $t^2$, not $\sqrt{t}$, but exactly $t$. This seemingly abstract fact has a concrete consequence in financial markets: under the idealised conditions of an at-the-money option with zero rates, it is precisely why option prices scale with $\sqrt{T}$ rather than $T$, a direct fingerprint of Brownian motion inside Black-Scholes. Understanding why requires looking at both &lt;strong&gt;physical observations&lt;/strong&gt; and the &lt;strong&gt;mathematical construction&lt;/strong&gt; of Brownian motion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>