Change of Measure

Why This Matters In the article on Girsanov’s Theorem, we studied how the real-world measure $\mathbb{P}$ and the risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}$ relate, and showed that switching between them amounts to reweighting paths via the Girsanov exponential. Throughout, the risk-free bond was the numéraire: the asset against which all prices were expressed. But this is a convenient choice, not a fundamental one. Any strictly positive self-financing wealth process can serve as a numéraire, and each choice gives a different probability measure under which asset prices, expressed in units of that numéraire, become martingales. The price of a derivative is invariant; what changes is how the problem is represented. So instead of viewing pricing as a fixed-measure expectation problem, it is often more natural to think of it as choosing the numéraire that best matches the structure of the payoff. ...

Why This Matters We want to price a derivative. Under the real world measure $\mathbb{P}$, we face two problems. First, we do not know the true drift $\mu$ of the underlying, and historical estimates are notoriously unreliable. Second, even if we knew $\mu$, taking the expected payoff under $\mathbb{P}$ would still not give the market price. Risky cash flows must be discounted more heavily than guaranteed ones because investors are risk averse. Pricing under $\mathbb{P}$ requires both the true probabilities of outcomes and a model for how the market prices risk. Both are fundamentally unobservable. So what can we do? ...