<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Change of Measure on Inflection Quant Lab</title><link>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/tags/change-of-measure/</link><description>Recent content in Change of Measure on Inflection Quant Lab</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/tags/change-of-measure/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Measure We Choose: How Numéraires Simplify Pricing</title><link>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/change_of_numeraire/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/change_of_numeraire/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the &lt;a href="../../articles/quant-foundations/girsanov/"&gt;article on Girsanov&amp;rsquo;s Theorem&lt;/a&gt;, we studied how the real-world measure $\mathbb{P}$ and the risk-neutral measure $\mathbb{Q}$ relate, and showed that switching between them amounts to reweighting paths via the Girsanov exponential. Throughout, the risk-free bond was the numéraire: the asset against which all prices were expressed. But this is a convenient choice, not a fundamental one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any strictly positive self-financing wealth process can serve as a numéraire, and each choice gives a different probability measure under which asset prices, expressed in units of that numéraire, become martingales. The price of a derivative is invariant; what changes is how the problem is represented. So instead of viewing pricing as a fixed-measure expectation problem, it is often more natural to think of it as choosing the numéraire that best matches the structure of the payoff.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Drift Lives in the Measure: An Intuitive Look at Girsanov's Theorem</title><link>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/girsanov/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/girsanov/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We want to price a derivative. Under the real world measure $\mathbb{P}$, we face
two problems. First, we do not know the true drift $\mu$ of the underlying, and
historical estimates are notoriously unreliable. Second, even if we knew $\mu$,
taking the expected payoff under $\mathbb{P}$ would still not give the market price.
Risky cash flows must be discounted more heavily than guaranteed ones because
investors are risk averse. Pricing under $\mathbb{P}$ requires both the true
probabilities of outcomes and a model for how the market prices risk. Both are
fundamentally unobservable. So what can we do?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>