<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Risk-Management on Inflection Quant Lab</title><link>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/tags/risk-management/</link><description>Recent content in Risk-Management on Inflection Quant Lab</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/tags/risk-management/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Quanto and Compo Commodity Options: FX's Hidden Role in Pricing and Risk</title><link>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/quanto_and_compo/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://inflection-quant.pages.dev/articles/quant-foundations/quanto_and_compo/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-this-matters"&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many of the world&amp;rsquo;s most actively traded commodities are priced in USD, yet end investors and corporates often operate in other currencies. A Canadian oil producer hedging output, a European airline managing jet fuel costs, or an Asian sovereign wealth fund allocating to commodity exposure all face the same underlying issue: commodity risk does not exist in isolation from FX risk. The standard approach is to hedge the commodity leg with USD-denominated futures or swaps and manage FX separately through forwards or options. This works, but it treats the two risks as independent. Quanto and compo options take a different approach by packaging both risks into a single instrument, but the way each handles FX risk creates some pricing and hedging subtleties that I find are easy to miss.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>